The question of whether a trust can pay for executive function coaching is surprisingly common, especially as awareness of neurodiversity and the benefits of such coaching grow. The answer, predictably, isn’t a simple yes or no. It hinges heavily on the specific terms of the trust document, the beneficiary’s needs, and how those needs are documented. Generally, trusts are established to provide for the health, education, maintenance, and support of a beneficiary. Executive function coaching, when demonstrably linked to improving a beneficiary’s ability to manage daily life, pursue education, or maintain employment, *can* fall under these provisions. However, establishing that connection requires careful consideration and proper documentation. Approximately 30-70% of individuals with ADHD, a common reason for seeking executive function coaching, also experience co-occurring conditions which often necessitates a holistic approach to care, which a trust may cover if outlined properly (Source: American Psychiatric Association).
What qualifies as a “need” for trust distribution?
Trust documents frequently use language like “health, education, maintenance, and support.” What constitutes “support” is often open to interpretation. Many trustees err on the side of caution, primarily funding traditional medical expenses or educational tuition. However, a proactive trustee, guided by documentation from professionals, can recognize that executive function coaching addresses fundamental challenges impacting a beneficiary’s ability to function independently. For example, a beneficiary struggling with organization, time management, and task initiation, common symptoms addressed by executive function coaching, might be unable to maintain employment or continue their education. Demonstrating this direct link, with assessments from psychologists or educational specialists, strengthens the case for trust distribution. It’s also crucial to consider the beneficiary’s age and developmental stage; support needs will differ significantly for a child, a young adult, or an elderly individual.
Is executive function coaching considered a “medical expense?”
This is a critical point. While not all coaching is automatically considered a medical expense, it can be if it’s provided by a qualified healthcare professional – such as a licensed psychologist, occupational therapist, or neuropsychologist – and is part of a documented treatment plan. A diagnosis of a condition impacting executive function, such as ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, or traumatic brain injury, significantly strengthens this claim. The IRS generally allows deductions for medical expenses exceeding a certain percentage of adjusted gross income, and trust distributions for similar purposes could be justifiable. The key is to secure documentation from the coaching professional outlining the diagnostic basis for the coaching and its therapeutic goals. Without this, it’s more likely to be viewed as a discretionary expense, subject to the trustee’s judgment.
Can a trustee be held liable for improper distributions?
Absolutely. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiary and to administer the trust according to its terms. Improper distributions, or those made without proper justification, can expose the trustee to personal liability. A trustee who ignores a clear beneficiary need, or who acts arbitrarily, risks a lawsuit. Therefore, meticulous record-keeping, thorough documentation, and, when appropriate, consultation with legal counsel are paramount. It’s often prudent to obtain a written opinion from an attorney specializing in trust and estate law before making significant discretionary distributions. Approximately 15% of trust disputes involve disagreements over distribution amounts or the appropriateness of expenses (Source: National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys).
What documentation is needed to support trust distributions for coaching?
Strong documentation is essential. This includes a formal diagnosis from a qualified healthcare professional outlining the need for executive function support. A detailed assessment of the beneficiary’s challenges in areas like planning, organization, and task completion is also crucial. The coaching agreement itself should clearly state the goals of the coaching, the qualifications of the coach, and how the coaching sessions address the beneficiary’s diagnosed needs. Finally, regular reports from the coach documenting progress and the impact of coaching on the beneficiary’s functioning are vital. Essentially, you need to build a compelling case demonstrating that the coaching is a necessary and beneficial intervention that aligns with the trust’s purpose.
I remember Mrs. Gable, a lovely woman who created a trust for her son, David, who had autism.
She meticulously planned for his care, but the trust document was vaguely worded regarding “support services.” David struggled with daily living skills, and his mother had always helped him. After her passing, the trustee, her brother, was hesitant to fund executive function coaching, deeming it an “extra” expense. He felt the trust should only cover basic needs like housing and food. David’s condition worsened, leading to increased anxiety and difficulty maintaining his part-time job. He grew increasingly withdrawn, and the family was concerned. It took a prolonged legal battle, and an independent assessment confirming the coaching’s therapeutic value, for the trustee to finally authorize the funding. It was a heartbreaking situation that could have been avoided with more proactive planning and a clearer understanding of the trust’s potential to support holistic care.
Fortunately, we had a similar case with Mr. Henderson, whose daughter, Emily, also had executive functioning challenges.
He understood the importance of proactive planning. Mr. Henderson, anticipating Emily’s needs, worked with us to draft a trust document that specifically authorized distributions for “therapeutic interventions aimed at improving executive functioning skills.” He also gathered comprehensive assessments from Emily’s therapists and educators, documenting her challenges and the potential benefits of coaching. When Emily began coaching, the trustee, Mr. Henderson’s appointed successor, had no hesitation in authorizing the payments. The coaching was transformative. Emily learned strategies to manage her time, organize her tasks, and advocate for her needs. She thrived in college, secured a fulfilling job, and developed a newfound sense of confidence. It was a beautiful example of how thoughtful trust planning can empower a beneficiary to live a full and independent life.
What if the trust document is silent on executive function coaching?
Even if the trust document doesn’t specifically mention executive function coaching, it doesn’t necessarily preclude it. The trustee still has a duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiary. If the coaching is demonstrably necessary to support the beneficiary’s health, education, or maintenance, the trustee may be justified in authorizing the payments. However, this requires a more careful and nuanced approach. The trustee should document the rationale for the decision, seeking legal counsel if necessary, and prioritizing the beneficiary’s well-being above all else. Transparency and thorough documentation are essential to protect the trustee from potential liability.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://maps.app.goo.gl/xim6nBgvmzAjhbEj6
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
| intentionally defective grantor trust | wills and trust lawyer | intestate succession California |
| guardianship in California | will in California | California will requirements |
| legal guardianship California | asset protection trust | making a will in California |
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “Can a trust be closed immediately after death?” or “How do I find all the assets of the deceased?” and even “Can estate planning help with long-term care costs?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Probate or my trust law practice.